A prominent lobbying group representing United States commercial banks has formally weighed in on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s recently finalized regulatory framework governing payment stablecoin issuance and custody. The group contends that the federal regulator’s interpretation of the law diverges significantly from the original intent established by Congress, setting off a fresh wave of debate over the competitive boundaries between digital assets and traditional banking institutions.
In a formal public notice issued on Wednesday, the American Bankers Association stated that while the OCC’s final rules implementing the GENIUS Act included several positive regulatory steps, the banking organization remains deeply critical of provisions related to stablecoin yield. The regulatory controversy centers around the OCC’s decision to drop a provision from its final rules that would have established a legal presumption that certain third-party arrangements violate the statute’s explicit ban on yield payments.
According to the ABA, the removal of this critical safeguard leaves a massive loophole that threatens the foundational structure of the financial system. "The final rule removes the OCC’s originally proposed safeguards that would have addressed indirect arrangements involving affiliates, exchanges and other distribution partners," the ABA stated in its release. "As a result, payment stablecoin issuers can provide economically equivalent yield while technically avoiding the statutory prohibition. The OCC also declined to adopt a broader presumption against arrangements designed to circumvent the ban."
The association elaborated further on the long-term systemic risks posed by these regulatory omissions, warning that the gaps could destabilize traditional credit markets. "Those gaps risk undermining the distinction Congress drew between payment stablecoins and traditional bank deposits, threatening the funds banks use to make the loans that drive the US economy," the group added.
The question of stablecoin rewards and yield payments has served as one of the most contentious battlegrounds for lawmakers, financial regulators, and commercial interest groups. These debates were fierce both before and after the GENIUS Act successfully passed through Congress in July 2025. The controversy continues to draw intense scrutiny amid broader legislative discussions surrounding the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a comprehensive crypto market structure bill that remains stalled in limbo following a failed procedural vote in the United States Senate last month.
While traditional banking advocates have united in their opposition to the OCC’s softened stance on yield, the cryptocurrency industry has expressed a markedly different perspective. Notably, the Blockchain Association voiced its approval of the regulatory change regarding the yield prohibition, arguing that the OCC’s adjustment successfully brought the final rule more closely in line with the actual statutory text enacted by lawmakers.
Meanwhile, other prominent traditional banking advocacy organizations have aligned themselves closely with the positions articulated by the ABA. The Bank Policy Institute issued a statement largely supporting the ABA’s critique, asserting that the regulatory decision to omit the proposed yield presumption effectively replaces necessary legal clarity with dangerous ambiguity, thereby putting the entire commercial banking system and its retail customers at severe risk of deposit flight.
The OCC finalized its overarching rules ahead of the formal implementation of the GENIUS Act, which is scheduled to take effect in January 2027. As the countdown to implementation continues, market participants and regulatory observers anticipate that other key federal government departments and agencies will soon release their own complementary rules and guidance concerning the GENIUS Act, particularly agencies exercising direct regulatory purview over stablecoins such as the Federal Reserve and the United States Department of the Treasury.
