October 25, 2026

Manus Secures Over $500 Million in Fresh Funding Following Blocked Meta Acquisition

Manus, the high-profile artificial intelligence agent startup that briefly found itself at the center of a geopolitical tug-of-war after a $2 billion acquisition by Meta was blocked by Chinese regulators, has officially rebounded with a massive new capital injection. The company has raised more than $500 million in fresh funding, signaling strong confidence from investors despite the turbulent regulatory landscape that forced its dramatic separation from the American tech giant.

The funding round was confirmed by the startup’s parent company, Butterfly Effect, through a post on WeChat. According to the announcement, the financing was co-led by Boyu Capital and IDG Capital, with participation from a roster of existing high-profile backers. These include tech titan Tencent, venture capital firm HSG—formerly known as Sequoia China—and ZhenFund.

While Butterfly Effect did not publicly disclose the precise valuation attached to this new funding round, Bloomberg previously reported that the company was targeting a $500 million raise at a valuation of approximately $4 billion. If accurate, that figure represents roughly double the $2 billion valuation that Meta had agreed to pay for the startup during its acquisition attempt late last year.

The company has not yet detailed how it plans to deploy the capital, though management indicated that the funds will be used to support ongoing hiring initiatives both within China and across international markets.

The Rise of Agentic AI and the Manus Phenomenon

Manus operates in the fast-evolving sector of autonomous AI agents—software designed to move beyond traditional conversational chatbots by taking broad human goals and executing complex multi-step workflows independently. Whether it is booking travel itineraries, conducting comprehensive research, or analyzing stock market data, these agents function with minimal human intervention.

When Manus first launched in March 2025, it positioned itself as a Chinese domestic rival to OpenAI’s high-end, subscription-based agent services. Initially available by invitation only, the platform sparked a massive frenzy among tech enthusiasts and industry watchers. Demand was so intense that unverified invite codes were reportedly listed on secondary Chinese resale marketplaces for as much as 10 million yuan, translating to over $1.3 million.

Beneath the surface, the startup utilized a hybrid technical approach, acknowledging that it relied on Anthropic’s Claude models and fine-tuned iterations of Alibaba’s Qwen models alongside its own proprietary technology. At the time, agentic AI was still a relatively niche frontier, and Manus was among the early pioneers experimenting with complex autonomous use cases before major global tech conglomerates fully shifted their focus to the space.

AI Startup Manus Raises $500 Million After China Nixed Meta’s $2 Billion Acquisition

Rapid Growth, Meta’s Acquisition Attempt, and Regulatory Intervention

As momentum built, Manus made strategic shifts in its operations, moving its core team to Singapore around mid-2025 while scaling back portions of its domestic footprint and implementing workforce reductions in July of that year. Despite these operational changes, the business scaled at a remarkable pace. By December 2025—just about eight months after its initial debut—the company reached $100 million in annual recurring revenue driven by its subscription model.

That same month, Meta announced a definitive agreement to acquire Manus for approximately $2 billion, aiming to harness the startup’s technology for its own next-generation AI initiatives.

However, the cross-border deal quickly encountered severe regulatory hurdles. In January, China’s Ministry of Commerce announced that it would review the acquisition. By March, co-founders Xiao Hong and Ji Yichao had been summoned to Beijing and restricted from leaving the country, according to reports by Reuters. The situation culminated on April 27, when the National Development and Reform Commission—China’s top economic planning agency—formally ordered the transaction to be unwound, explicitly stating it would prohibit foreign investment in Manus in accordance with local laws and regulations.

Faced with the binding government mandate, Meta officially severed ties with the startup in June. By August, Manus announced that it would resume operations as an independent entity. To completely separate its technical infrastructure from Meta, the company took the drastic step of deleting user data created on or after December 29, 2025.

Navigating a Shifting Competitive and Regulatory Environment

The landscape Manus returned to as an independent company had shifted significantly during its brief entanglement with Meta. While the startup was tied up in regulatory reviews, market attention had partially gravitated toward open-source alternatives like OpenClaw, a decentralized agent running on local machines that gained viral traction on GitHub and prompted OpenAI to hire its creator, Peter Steinberger, to spearhead its personal agent initiatives.

Meanwhile, Meta subsequently launched its own developer-focused coding agent, Muse Code, in August, entering a crowded market alongside established tools like Codex and Claude Code. For its part, Manus has continued to refine its product offerings, currently marketing Cue—an application that equips agents with dedicated phone numbers and digital wallets constrained by strictly defined user budgets.

The saga surrounding Manus unfolds against a backdrop of increasing government oversight of China’s technology sector. In May, Beijing implemented tighter travel restrictions requiring senior artificial intelligence personnel at prominent private firms, including Alibaba and DeepSeek, to secure official approval before traveling abroad. These measures reflect a growing sensitivity as domestic AI development increasingly reaches parity with American competitors, transforming the technology sector into a critical domain of national economic strategy.