Holding digital assets for the long term has long been touted as one of the most reliable strategies for building wealth in the volatile cryptocurrency market. However, nearly nine years after crypto broke into the global mainstream during the frenzied bull run that peaked in late 2017 and early 2018, that strategy has not yielded positive results for every major coin.
A prime example is XRP, the payments-focused cryptocurrency native to the XRP Ledger and currently the world’s fifth-largest digital asset by market value. While most major cryptocurrencies have climbed far above their previous cycle highs, enriching long-term holders along the way, XRP continues to trade well below its historic peak set in January 2018.
Currently, XRP changes hands at approximately $1.33. This represents a steep 62.5% decline from its early January 2018 peak of $3.55. In practical terms, an investor who purchased XRP at the absolute height of that historic rally remains underwater nearly nine years later. While XRP did manage to briefly eclipse its old high—reaching a temporary peak of $3.66 in July 2025 before suffering a sharp correction—it has failed to sustain those levels.
In stark contrast, the broader cryptocurrency market has achieved massive gains since that previous era. Bitcoin, the world’s leading digital asset, is up roughly 314% from its December 2017 peak of $19,804, trading around $80,955. Similarly, meme-turned-mainstream asset Dogecoin sits up 322% from its January 2018 high at $0.082, while Binance Coin (BNB) has skyrocketed by about 2,800% to trade near $729. Even other prominent layer-1 tokens and privacy coins have vastly outperformed XRP’s long-term price trajectory: Ether is up 66% from its early cycle highs at $2,442, Zcash is up 38%, and Tron trades just slightly below its historic peak with a modest 4% loss. Newer market entrants, such as Solana, launched years later in 2020 and established entirely new valuation benchmarks.
Although bitcoin, ether, and many other leading tokens have pulled back sharply from their own explosive peaks reached in 2025, they nonetheless remain far above their 2017 highs. XRP’s ongoing struggle to reclaim its historical price milestone has consequently become a point of extensive discussion among market analysts and asset managers tracking the digital economy.
The Dilution of Supply and Expanding Token Counts
When examining why XRP’s fiat price has lagged behind its historical records, market analysts point first to the substantial growth of the asset’s circulating supply over the years.
"Circulating supply grew 63%, from 38.7 billion in 2017 to 63.1 billion, while XRP’s total market value fell only about 3%," explains Nicolai Sondergaard, senior research analyst at analytics firm Nansen. "More XRP in circulation means each token represents a smaller share of roughly the same total value."
Circulating supply refers to the exact number of coins currently active and available on the open market. As this figure expands through scheduled releases, token unlocks, or other distribution mechanisms, the economic weight of each individual coin diminishes, meaning that a higher total market capitalization is required to reach the same per-token price point seen in previous cycles.
Oliver Carding, head of marketing at Tesseract Group—an institutional digital asset management firm overseeing more than $500 million in assets under management—suggests that XRP presents a significantly different picture when evaluated through the lens of total market capitalization rather than nominal spot price.
"On value, XRP recovered," Carding noted, emphasizing that the underlying network value has proven more resilient than individual token prices indicate. "About 63% more XRP is in circulation than at that peak, so the same circulating market capitalization would mean a price roughly 39% lower."
Weaker Institutional and Retail Demand
Beyond supply dynamics, structural demand for XRP has faced persistent headwinds compared to the dominant market leaders. In recent years, U.S.-listed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have dramatically altered the digital asset landscape by opening the floodgates for institutional capital to flow seamlessly into cryptocurrencies. While spot bitcoin and ether investment products have successfully pulled in tens of billions of dollars, equivalent XRP investment funds have experienced severely muted inflows.
"ETF uptake has also been muted relative to BTC and ETH," points out Paul Howard, senior director at market-making firm Wincent.
Market data from institutional tracking source SoSoValue indicates that XRP-focused funds have accumulated a total of just $1.80 billion in investor capital since debuting nearly a year ago. By comparison, established bitcoin exchange-traded funds routinely attract over $1 billion in net investor inflows during a single trading day, illustrating a massive disparity in institutional appetite.
Data compiled by Nansen further underscores a broader cooling of retail and speculative interest across the XRP ecosystem. Spot trading volume for the token has fallen by 53.5%, perpetual futures volume has declined by 44%, and active wallet addresses on the network have dropped by 10.7%, indicating reduced overall network engagement.

Ripple’s Strategic Focus and Shifting Market Narratives
Another critical factor influencing XRP’s market standing is the corporate focus of Ripple, the financial technology company closely associated with the digital asset. While various sectors of the broader cryptocurrency market exploded over the years by aggressively courting decentralized finance (DeFi), artificial intelligence narratives, and viral memecoin ecosystems—all of which successfully captured massive capital flows and deep integrations with traditional finance—Ripple maintained a much narrower strategic horizon.
"Ripple, meanwhile, has been working hard to build payment infrastructure, RLUSD and trade financing products around the usage of the ledger and coin, and this has taken focus from just core XRP," Howard explains, highlighting the company’s persistent dedication to enterprise-grade cross-border payments rather than speculative retail trends.
Furthermore, the broader crypto investing landscape has evolved dramatically since 2017, introducing alternative destinations for capital that did not exist or were in their infancy during previous cycles.
"The role of DeFi for investment into ETH, SOL and HYPE has also been a new narrative which XRP has not focused on," Howard adds, pointing to the emergence of alternative Layer-1 ecosystems and specialized yield-generating protocols that continually attract liquidity away from legacy payment tokens.
The Long Shadow of the SEC Legal Battle
Undoubtedly, one of the most significant external weights holding XRP back over the past half-decade has been its prolonged legal battle with United States financial regulators.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated a high-profile lawsuit against Ripple and two of its top executives in December 2020. The regulatory agency alleged that the company had unlawfully raised approximately $1.3 billion by distributing XRP through offerings that constituted unregistered securities sales.
The ensuing litigation created an atmosphere of extreme regulatory uncertainty that heavily impacted market access. A federal judge delivered a mixed ruling in 2023, determining that programmatic sales of XRP on public exchanges did not qualify as securities offerings, whereas direct sales to institutional buyers did violate securities laws. Subsequent legal developments resulted in Ripple being ordered to pay a $125 million financial penalty in 2024. The protracted legal saga finally concluded in August 2025, when both Ripple and the SEC formally dropped their respective appeals.
Industry experts note that this multi-year legal overhang fundamentally disrupted XRP’s market cycle performance. The regulatory pressure explains why the asset completely missed out on the explosive price rallies witnessed during the 2021 crypto bull market, a period during which major domestic platforms like Coinbase temporarily suspended trading of the token.
"The SEC case helps explain why XRP did not revisit its 2018 high in 2021, when Coinbase suspended trading, but the appeals were dropped in August 2025 with XRP above $3," Carding observes. "Since then, XRP is down about 59%, against 32% for bitcoin and 44% for ether, and its circulating market capitalisation is down about 56%."
Evaluating the Broader Market Landscape
Despite its unique struggles, XRP is far from being the only digital asset from the top-tier rankings of 2018 that continues to trade below its historical milestones.
"On price, six of the other nine assets in the January 2018 top ten are further below their levels of that week," Carding points out, illustrating that survivorship bias often skews public perception of long-term crypto performance.
For market participants and analysts closely monitoring XRP’s future trajectory, professional observers advise looking beyond simple nominal price charts and focusing instead on fundamental economic metrics.
"What I would watch is XRP against bitcoin, alongside net monthly distribution after re-escrow and changes in fund holdings," Carding advises. "Relative weakness that persists as distribution slows would point to weaker demand."
In practical terms, this analytical approach involves tracking whether XRP continues to underperform bitcoin even during periods when the actual rate of new token distribution slows down—such as when tokens are systematically returned to Ripple’s scheduled escrow accounts. If the rate of circulating supply growth decelerates while XRP still consistently lags behind bitcoin, it serves as a clear indicator that broader investor demand for the asset is continuing to soften relative to the rest of the cryptocurrency market.
